<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hunters vs. Farmers: Why Mother Nature Separates Sales and Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spurspectives.com/hunters-vs-farmers-why-mother-nature-separates-sales-and-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spurspectives.com/hunters-vs-farmers-why-mother-nature-separates-sales-and-marketing/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of social media and 1:1 marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Svet</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/hunters-vs-farmers-why-mother-nature-separates-sales-and-marketing/#comment-5497</link>
		<dc:creator>David Svet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=137#comment-5497</guid>
		<description>Great insight! Thank you. I agree that the two functions should be integrated toward a common goal, should work together to make it happen, and should cooperate in sharing and critiquing information. I also agree that leadership is a core driver in making the integration work. I think we may disagree with one another as to who should be responsible for the leadership. I would place that type of leadership responsibility at the desk of the president or CEO. I think we may be splitting hairs. 

I just found a great article from a Harvard marketing professor that covers this subject and makes both of our points! He even used the hunter/farmer metaphor, only differently. 

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3154.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great insight! Thank you. I agree that the two functions should be integrated toward a common goal, should work together to make it happen, and should cooperate in sharing and critiquing information. I also agree that leadership is a core driver in making the integration work. I think we may disagree with one another as to who should be responsible for the leadership. I would place that type of leadership responsibility at the desk of the president or CEO. I think we may be splitting hairs. </p>
<p>I just found a great article from a Harvard marketing professor that covers this subject and makes both of our points! He even used the hunter/farmer metaphor, only differently. </p>
<p><a href="http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3154.html" rel="nofollow">http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3154.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keenan</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/hunters-vs-farmers-why-mother-nature-separates-sales-and-marketing/#comment-5494</link>
		<dc:creator>Keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=137#comment-5494</guid>
		<description>Love the metaphor or is it a simile?   NO matter, you are spot on in the comparison.   

However, I disagree with your assertion they should be separate. I believe they should be together and managed towards a single goal.  Integrating them makes them much more powerful.  

The challenges you talk about, in my opinion, are leadership challenges not "Mother Nature".   A good leader in that position will know how to balance their unique traits, map them accordingly and capitalize on their symbiotic nature.  A poor leader will default to one or the other leaving one completely under utilized.   

It's not the functions, it's the leaders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the metaphor or is it a simile?   NO matter, you are spot on in the comparison.   </p>
<p>However, I disagree with your assertion they should be separate. I believe they should be together and managed towards a single goal.  Integrating them makes them much more powerful.  </p>
<p>The challenges you talk about, in my opinion, are leadership challenges not &#8220;Mother Nature&#8221;.   A good leader in that position will know how to balance their unique traits, map them accordingly and capitalize on their symbiotic nature.  A poor leader will default to one or the other leaving one completely under utilized.   </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the functions, it&#8217;s the leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Favreau</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/hunters-vs-farmers-why-mother-nature-separates-sales-and-marketing/#comment-5485</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Favreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=137#comment-5485</guid>
		<description>I have to agree.  I am NOT a salesperson but I love mining for data, learning new strategy and communicating with the consumer.  I cringe at the thought of sales.  I prefer strategy to get the process going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree.  I am NOT a salesperson but I love mining for data, learning new strategy and communicating with the consumer.  I cringe at the thought of sales.  I prefer strategy to get the process going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

