<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Killing The English Language?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of social media and 1:1 marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Grasberger</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/#comment-54278</link>
		<dc:creator>John Grasberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=167#comment-54278</guid>
		<description>I am once again viewing Ken Burns's wonderful PBS documentary series, "The Civil War," and I despair that the youth - and even adults - of today have forever lost the ability to write.  Here is an excerpt from the series, consisting of an introduction, a letter written by a SOLDIER of the time, and a final note.  The letter, I think, is beautiful and eloquent and well out of reach of today's 140-character travesty:

"A week before the battle of Bull Run, Sullivan Beaulieu, a major in the Second Rhode Island Volunteers, wrote home to his wife in Smithfield:

     July the 14th, 1861
     Washington, D.C.

     Dear Sarah,

     The indications are very strong that we shall move in a few days, perhaps tomorrow.  And lest I should not be able to write you again, I feel impelled to write a few lines that may fall under your eye when I am no more.
     I have no misgivings about or lack of confidence in the cause in which I am engaged, and my courage does not halt or falter.  I know how American civilization now leans upon the triumph of the government and how great a debt we owe to those who went before us through the blood and suffering of the Revolution, and I am willing, perfectly willing, to lay down all my joys in this life to help maintain this government and to pay that debt.
     Sarah, my love for you is depthless.  It seems to bind me with mighty cables that nothing but Omnipotence can break.  And yet my love of country comes over me like a strong wind and bears me irresistibly with all those chains to the battlefield.  
     The memory of all the blissful moments I’ve enjoyed with you come crowding over me, and I feel mostly deeply grateful to God, and you, that I’ve enjoyed them for so long.  And how hard it is for me to give them up and burn to ashes the hopes of future years when, God willing, we might still have lived and loved together and see our boys grown up to honorable manhood around us.
     If I do not return, my dear Sarah, never forget how much I loved you, nor that when my last breath escapes me on the battlefield, it will whisper your name.  Forgive my many faults, and the many pains that I have caused you.  How thoughtless, how foolish, I have sometimes been.  
     But, oh Sarah, if the dead can come back to this earth and flit unseen around those they love, I shall always be with you in the brightest day and the darkest night.  Always, always.  And when the soft breeze fans your cheek, it shall be my breath; or the cool air your throbbing temple, it shall be my spirit passing by.
     Sarah, do not mourn me dead.  Think I am gone and wait for me; for we shall meet again.
. . .

Sullivan Beaulieu was killed a week later, at the first battle of Bull Run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am once again viewing Ken Burns&#8217;s wonderful PBS documentary series, &#8220;The Civil War,&#8221; and I despair that the youth - and even adults - of today have forever lost the ability to write.  Here is an excerpt from the series, consisting of an introduction, a letter written by a SOLDIER of the time, and a final note.  The letter, I think, is beautiful and eloquent and well out of reach of today&#8217;s 140-character travesty:</p>
<p>&#8220;A week before the battle of Bull Run, Sullivan Beaulieu, a major in the Second Rhode Island Volunteers, wrote home to his wife in Smithfield:</p>
<p>     July the 14th, 1861<br />
     Washington, D.C.</p>
<p>     Dear Sarah,</p>
<p>     The indications are very strong that we shall move in a few days, perhaps tomorrow.  And lest I should not be able to write you again, I feel impelled to write a few lines that may fall under your eye when I am no more.<br />
     I have no misgivings about or lack of confidence in the cause in which I am engaged, and my courage does not halt or falter.  I know how American civilization now leans upon the triumph of the government and how great a debt we owe to those who went before us through the blood and suffering of the Revolution, and I am willing, perfectly willing, to lay down all my joys in this life to help maintain this government and to pay that debt.<br />
     Sarah, my love for you is depthless.  It seems to bind me with mighty cables that nothing but Omnipotence can break.  And yet my love of country comes over me like a strong wind and bears me irresistibly with all those chains to the battlefield.<br />
     The memory of all the blissful moments I’ve enjoyed with you come crowding over me, and I feel mostly deeply grateful to God, and you, that I’ve enjoyed them for so long.  And how hard it is for me to give them up and burn to ashes the hopes of future years when, God willing, we might still have lived and loved together and see our boys grown up to honorable manhood around us.<br />
     If I do not return, my dear Sarah, never forget how much I loved you, nor that when my last breath escapes me on the battlefield, it will whisper your name.  Forgive my many faults, and the many pains that I have caused you.  How thoughtless, how foolish, I have sometimes been.<br />
     But, oh Sarah, if the dead can come back to this earth and flit unseen around those they love, I shall always be with you in the brightest day and the darkest night.  Always, always.  And when the soft breeze fans your cheek, it shall be my breath; or the cool air your throbbing temple, it shall be my spirit passing by.<br />
     Sarah, do not mourn me dead.  Think I am gone and wait for me; for we shall meet again.<br />
. . .</p>
<p>Sullivan Beaulieu was killed a week later, at the first battle of Bull Run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Kon</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/#comment-9692</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Kon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 03:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=167#comment-9692</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Confused with Twitter.Com Language?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found your entry interesting thus I've added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Confused with Twitter.Com Language?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found your entry interesting thus I&#8217;ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autom</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/#comment-6159</link>
		<dc:creator>autom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=167#comment-6159</guid>
		<description>hear, hear..perhaps your most eloquent and articulate post. spot on. kudos ;-) a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hear, hear..perhaps your most eloquent and articulate post. spot on. kudos <img src='http://spurspectives.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keenan</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/#comment-6146</link>
		<dc:creator>Keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=167#comment-6146</guid>
		<description>Have you read any writing from the early 1900's?  How about anything from the 19th century?  

We killed the English language long before this pup of 20 read his first Little Critter's book.  Tell him to get over it.  We haven't used proper English in at least 100 years.  The English language has been a dead, rotting corpse for a long time.  Using Twitter isn't going to do a thing to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you read any writing from the early 1900&#8217;s?  How about anything from the 19th century?  </p>
<p>We killed the English language long before this pup of 20 read his first Little Critter&#8217;s book.  Tell him to get over it.  We haven&#8217;t used proper English in at least 100 years.  The English language has been a dead, rotting corpse for a long time.  Using Twitter isn&#8217;t going to do a thing to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Marketing Renaissance? &#124; iThnk.com</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/#comment-6133</link>
		<dc:creator>The Marketing Renaissance? &#124; iThnk.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=167#comment-6133</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogs and tweets? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogs and tweets? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Svet</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/#comment-6125</link>
		<dc:creator>David Svet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=167#comment-6125</guid>
		<description>Pete,
I have a hard time with the 140 character limit as well. For me, Twitter works for short, conversational chat or for pointing to other long form content.

Clockwork Organge! Yikes, let's hope not! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,<br />
I have a hard time with the 140 character limit as well. For me, Twitter works for short, conversational chat or for pointing to other long form content.</p>
<p>Clockwork Organge! Yikes, let&#8217;s hope not! <img src='http://spurspectives.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Roythorne</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/#comment-6124</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Roythorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=167#comment-6124</guid>
		<description>Having spent several years working as a sub-editor this is a subject very close to my heart. I have to say that it upsets me to use abbreviations to get my thoughts into 140 characters, and in your friend's defence I do find that texting allows me to express myself fully and in the gramatically correct fashion. 

Personally, however, I agree with both you and Jeff, but I also think your friend has a point. Whilst it may not be affecting our English usage, there is probably a strong argument for the fact that it will have an effect on English usage in the next generation. Whether this will drive us towards a language reminiscent of Clockwork Orange, who knows! 

Then again progress is progress and language most move on, as does everything else. Methinks it's hardly like we all speak Shakespearean English anymore is it, forsooth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having spent several years working as a sub-editor this is a subject very close to my heart. I have to say that it upsets me to use abbreviations to get my thoughts into 140 characters, and in your friend&#8217;s defence I do find that texting allows me to express myself fully and in the gramatically correct fashion. </p>
<p>Personally, however, I agree with both you and Jeff, but I also think your friend has a point. Whilst it may not be affecting our English usage, there is probably a strong argument for the fact that it will have an effect on English usage in the next generation. Whether this will drive us towards a language reminiscent of Clockwork Orange, who knows! </p>
<p>Then again progress is progress and language most move on, as does everything else. Methinks it&#8217;s hardly like we all speak Shakespearean English anymore is it, forsooth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Svet</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/#comment-6122</link>
		<dc:creator>David Svet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=167#comment-6122</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jeff. Ironically, my friend is really in to texting. I'm confused! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jeff. Ironically, my friend is really in to texting. I&#8217;m confused! <img src='http://spurspectives.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hurt</title>
		<link>http://spurspectives.com/is-twitter-killing-the-english-language/#comment-6119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spurspectives.com/?p=167#comment-6119</guid>
		<description>I'm with you Dave. Twitter is not killing the English language. His reasoning for not using Twitter is flawed, perhaps even a self-justified excuse because he doesn’t see value in Twitter. That’s like saying texting is killing the English language. Huh, typing words and letters is killing the English language? 

Twitter forces people to write and think succinctly, which is a good thing in my opinion. People get to the point quicker and then back up their points on their blogs or in conversations. IMO, Twitter is an information communication tool on steroids. And, Twitter is what you choose to make of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Dave. Twitter is not killing the English language. His reasoning for not using Twitter is flawed, perhaps even a self-justified excuse because he doesn’t see value in Twitter. That’s like saying texting is killing the English language. Huh, typing words and letters is killing the English language? </p>
<p>Twitter forces people to write and think succinctly, which is a good thing in my opinion. People get to the point quicker and then back up their points on their blogs or in conversations. IMO, Twitter is an information communication tool on steroids. And, Twitter is what you choose to make of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

